Motivation in History: Charles Beard and the Founding Fathers Essay

Throughout history in that respect argon either kinds of historians that describe intimately our history and how we got to where we are. Charles beard is a funny historian because he talks roughly the motives on our history event by non just any event. This effect created a lot of debate on what Charles Beard believed and that is the motives of the Founding Fathers.Charles Beard print An Economic Interpretation of the reputation of the unite States on whether the personalitys backers plain concerned for the nation or were they evoke in protecting their own somatic interest. He also describes that questioning the motives of the opuss supporters, it also demonstrated how of import our interpretations of the past could be.The supporters of the Constitution before make the phrases of Confederation. The Article of Confederation was designed for the States to pay the power and to set about a frail central government, but it produced some problems. property capital suf fered downstairs the Articles of Confederation, the lack of securities for American products and investments into the foreign market. Also under the Article of Confederation the government was not remunerative the interest on its debt from the war, which crippled the country. He make these arguments to back his dissertation on that the supporters of the Constitution was looking for their interest and not entirely the nations interest.After Charles Beard published this dissertation, made a dispute against opposite historians.These historians do not believe Charles Beards thesis and try to repel his thoughts and rear that the supports did not write the Constitution for their own interest. In a chart, which shows the Delegates that were at the Constitution Convention. The Delegates on this chart are slew having man security holdings, who are muckle from all different backgrounds. The Delegates more often than not signed the Constitution were not all wealthy landowners looki ng out for them. in that respect was some small farmer in that group, who would never sign the document to arrive at the rich. In other chart on the Delegates to the New York State Ratifying Convention shows that on that point was a mixes ofpeople with different sparing status pick out for the Ratifying Convention. Also the people who voted were Federal and Anti-Federal that voted Federal, plus lawyers did not vote for it and those would be the kind of people to necessitate the Constitution if it was to benefit the supporters. This chart viewing that it was not just the supports interest it was made for the nation because they were different people voting different agencys.The Founding Fathers Debate the face of Congress discusses about the thought of the Delegates, who were at the Convention. Mr. Gerry was bingle of those men in that respect and he give tongue to The evil we experience fertilise from the excess of democracy. Also It would seem to be maxim of democracy to starve the public servants. To what Mr. Gerry said and that he left without sign language the Constitution and who also had the largest amount of money. every these disprove what Beard was trying to prove in his thesis because if it benefited the supporters wont he be one to wishing to sign it.John Madison said From the protection of differing and unequal abilities for the acquiring of property, there results the possession of different degrees and kinds of property and from the fix of these differences there follows a division of order of magnitude into different interests and parties. With different interests there cannot be a majority making the Constitution for their own interest. Alexander Hamilton discuses about the ask the government must attend to and under the Article of Confederation would never be possible. He pushes the Constitution that can cover all of its problems and looked for the best interest of the people because it does benefit him just the stability of the country.I believe that Beards thesis on the motives of the Founding Fathers was not entirely correct because it was more than economics. I am impress on his thesis because he does creates support back up his thesis and with just indicant his writing it makes you approve is it possible, which is want he want that to be the reaction of people. The problem is if you are an historian you could not just read his writing, you must research other source and reading other primary sources the Beards thesis died out.Beard thesis is a step to understand our past with this the historians make up others to research better and so on. That was one of Beards goalsbut it backfired and took his thesis out of believing it was possible. This is a way of life and that it is the right of the Constitution to have been able to disprove peoples work and make better to understand our past.